![]() There are a LOT of discrepancies in the dial numbers ascribed to the watches, even on non-eBay sites. And many of the discrepancies are supported by pictures of the watch back, showing the wrong dial number (7A10, 7A11, or 7A19). There's no reason for me to disbelieve the veracity of the photographs. So that leads me to th e next question, how is that so many watches have come into being with wrong watch backs? Is it possible that Seiko originally manufactured them that way (almost randomly assigning them watch backs with 5T52-XXXX numbers)?Īnd is this problem, mislabeled watch backs, a well-known issue with the AOD watches? Am I being too picky in raising this issue? The watch is a Calibre 5T52 in all cases and functions the same, regardless of dial numbers. Caligula 1979 The Imperial Edition Uncut Gemstones. So, is this really a case of it makes no difference what the last four digits are? It appears that you've labelled them correctly although we can't see the case backs. The labels should match the numbers on the case backs which record the movement and case numbers. The second dial numbers, I believe, refer to the dial designations, which is why a watch with the same movement-case number can have a different dial number. ![]() I have a 5T52-7A10, but not the one pictured. I corresponded with Boris from the Comcast AOD website. Bottom line: it is possible for the same watch (movement/dial configuration) to be labeled differently. He didn't go into how frequently that might have happened. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |